Home

Tunisia: The Arab Spring’s first president, almost

While there is hope that Tunisia’s first democratically elected president marks a fresh start, only time will tell if he can satisfy the expectations of his people.
Kacem Jlidi
13 December 2011

On January 14, Ben Ali fled Tunisia bringing an end to 55 years of continuous dictatorship dating back to the French occupation. Today, December 12, less than one year later, Tunisia has a new president: Moncef Marzouki, a Human Rights activist and leader of the secular center-left Congress for the Republic (CPR) party. Marzouki is only the third President in the history of the Tunisian Republic, and the first democratically elected president in the post-revolution era. 

Marzouki studied medicine at the University of Strasbourg (France). Returning to Tunisia in 1979, he founded the Center for Community Medicine in Sousse and the African Network for Prevention of Child Abuse, also joining the Tunisian League for Human Rights.

Protesters in Tahrir Square on election day

President Macef Marzouki of Tunisia

When the government cracked down violently on the Islamist Ennahda Movement in 1991, Marzouki confronted Tunisian President Ben Ali calling on him to adhere to the law. In 2001, he founded the Congress for the Republic Party. This was banned in 2002, but Marzouki moved to France and continued running it. 

The Constituent Assembly of Tunisia, elected on October 23 to govern the country and draft a new constitution, elected Marzouki as the President of the Tunisian Republic, with 155 votes for, 3 against, and 42 blank votes. Blank votes were the result of a boycott from the opposition parties, who considered the new “mini-constitution” to be undemocratic. 

His appointment follows a week of animated debate within the Constituent Assembly focused on the formation of Tunisia’s provisional constitution.

The Constituent Assembly opened the floor last week for presidential candidacy according to the conditions of an interim law related to the division of powers which indicates that the Tunisian President must fulfill the following conditions: “To be a Tunisian Muslim, non-carrier of a foreign nationality, born to a Tunisian father and mother and to be an adult of 35 years old at least.” 

The adopted constitution, containing 26 articles, is known informally as the “mini-constitution,” and it delineates the roles and entitlements of the legislative, judicial, and executive branches of the interim government. The document will expire following the administration of general elections, potentially within the year.

It should be highlighted here that the Congress for the Republic, which won the second highest number of seats in the October election, collecting 29 seats out of 217 seats at the Constituent Assembly, had formed a coalition with the Ennahda Islamist Party (highest number of seats) and the Ettakatol (third highest number of seats) led by Mustfa Ben Jaafer, currently the head of the Constituent Assembly.

Thus the presidential appointment has its fair share of critics, for even though there is broad agreement that Marzouki has a relatively clean past, the appointment was steamrollered through due to the prior agreement within the coalition to appoint him. Other voices were not given an opportunity to fully weigh in and the constitutional promises have yet to be consolidated into the government.

Myriam, a Tunisian student studying Political Sciences in Paris summed up the discontent over Marzouki’s appointment in a poignant tweet which said: “interim government is limited by no time frame, the executive board is not elected and the constitution isn’t open for confirmation through a referendum. Welcome to democracy.”

So while there is hope that Tunisia’s first democratically elected President marks a fresh start, only time will tell if he can satisfy the expectations of his people.

Stop the secrecy: Publish the NHS COVID data deals


To: Matt Hancock, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care

We’re calling on you to immediately release details of the secret NHS data deals struck with private companies, to deliver the NHS COVID-19 datastore.

We, the public, deserve to know exactly how our personal information has been traded in this ‘unprecedented’ deal with US tech giants like Google, and firms linked to Donald Trump (Palantir) and Vote Leave (Faculty AI).

The COVID-19 datastore will hold private, personal information about every single one of us who relies on the NHS. We don’t want our personal data falling into the wrong hands.

And we don’t want private companies – many with poor reputations for protecting privacy – using it for their own commercial purposes, or to undermine the NHS.

The datastore could be an important tool in tackling the pandemic. But for it to be a success, the public has to be able to trust it.

Today, we urgently call on you to publish all the data-sharing agreements, data-impact assessments, and details of how the private companies stand to profit from their involvement.

The NHS is a precious public institution. Any involvement from private companies should be open to public scrutiny and debate. We need more transparency during this pandemic – not less.


By adding my name to this campaign, I authorise openDemocracy and Foxglove to keep me updated about their important work.

Had enough of ‘alternative facts’? openDemocracy is different Join the conversation: get our weekly email

Comments

We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData