Throughout the week, I felt there was a divide between the ‘important’ people (the diplomats and country representatives) and the ‘less important’ people (such as those representing civil society organisations and NGOs). This was seen even in the seating arrangements, with the former group sat on the main floor, right in front of the podium, an area that we in the latter group were not able to access.
Listening to the scripted speeches of ministers, heads of states and diplomats – most of which lacked passion – I didn’t feel the speakers had any genuine interest in migration issues.
Many mentioned climate migrations and I kept asking myself: what do you do daily to fight climate change? Do you really care? Do you take concrete actions to reduce your carbon footprint, or do you just read off your speech? If you truly care about migration, why aren’t affected communities fairly represented here? Why are you talking on behalf of them?
These problems are not exclusive to the IMRF. They were also seen at two other high-level, global events of the last year: the Generation Equality Forum (GEF), which was held in Paris in July, and COP26, which took place in Glasgow four months later.
It was almost impossible for young people from marginalized communities to attend all three forums, because they were held in expensive cities in the Global North – in countries known for their lengthy and costly visa processes for people from the Global South. This meant it felt like those who are directly impacted by the issues were always missing from the room and from discussions.
We didn’t see enough youth, especially women and girls. Nor did we hear from migrants and refugees themselves or from the climate change-affected communities most at risk of displacement. Indigenous people were barely included in discussions, and almost no one mentioned LGBTQIA+ communities.
Comments
We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.