Home

Brazil: woman's work vs men's mess

The first year of Brazil's first female president has seen Dilma Rousseff build on the achievement of her predecessor, Luis Inácio Lula da Silva. But she is also having to cope with the more difficult parts of his legacy, says Arthur Ituassu.
Arthur Ituassu
23 November 2011

Dilma Rousseff approaches the anniversary of her inauguration as Brazil's president at the beginning of 2012 following a year when policy advances and political setbacks have tumbled into one another. Among the most spectacular of the latter is a series of corruption scandals which has led to the fall of no less than five of her ministers. The president personally has not been touched by any of these scandals, and her speed and firmness in insisting on the departure of those responsible are to her credit. But the catalogue of incidents - all of which involve male ministers - has to a degree overshadowed her first year in office.
 
It could even get worse. A sixth target is the minister of labour, Carlos Lupi, who is accused of demanding payoffs from NGOs in receipt of government contracts. Similar charges forced Orlando Silva from the ministry of sports in October, in the midst of preparations for the football world cup (2014) and the Olympic games in Rio de Janeiro (2016). His loss was preceded by that of Dilma's influential chief-of-staff and ex-campaign manager, Antonio Palocci, over allegations of illicit enrichment, in June; Alfredo Nascimento (ministry of transport), in July; Wagner Rossi (ministry of agriculture), in August; and Pedro Novais (ministry of tourism), in September.
 
If that were not enough, Dilma also lost another minister, though not for a corruption scandal. Nelson Jobim (ministry of defence) resigned in June after inelegant public criticism of two women promoted by Dilma Rousseff, a political episode that emphasised the maleness of the ministerial mess. In an interview Jobim said that Gleisi Hoffmann, who replaced Palocci, "does not know Brasília", and called Ideli Salvatti, responsible for Dilma’s difficult political relations with Brazil's congress in a year of fiscal restrictions, "very weak".
 
In a broader light, the spate of resignations highlights the problematic side of the political legacy of Dilma Rousseff's predecessor and mentor, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. After all, with only one exception (Pedro Novais), all the ministers who had fallen during Dilma's first year were in place during Lula's presidency (2003-10), and most of the charges against them date from that period. Orlando Silva was appointed in April 2006; Wagner Rossi in April 2010; Alfredo Nascimento served from 2007 to March 2010, and then returned with Dilma in January 2011. Carlos Lupi, now engulfed in serious accusations, for example, was appointed in March 2007, at the start of Lula´s second term.
 
Lula left the Brazilian presidency a very popular figure (with ratings of more than 80%), and his current serious illness if anything reinforces this status. Yet the series of corruption scandals during his administration and now in Dilma´s first year in office raise hard questions about how public funds and domestic negotiations have been handled in Brazil since 2002. It is natural then that great expectations are being invested in a governmental reform planned by Dilma for January 2012.
 
The next plan

At the same time, Dilma Rousseff has extended the social programmes that were at the heart of Lula's political success. She began her presidency by raising by almost 20% the monthly payment (the famous Bolsa Família) given by the government to Brazil's poor families. This minimum-income programme benefits more than 50 million people, in a country where (according to new data from the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics [IBGE]) the richest 10% own more than 40% of total household income and half of the population lives on less than 400 reais (R$400 / $235) per month.
 
In June 2011, Dilma Rousseff launched a plan called Brasil sem miséria (Brazil without poverty), whose goal - backed by the direct involvement of eight ministries - is to take more than 16 million Brazilians out of extreme poverty. The project targets people who live on less than R$70 ($40) per month; it includes the Bolsa Família, other direct benefits for very poor families to buy food, an educational programme ending in technical and professional qualifications, and resources for very poor families who live in environmentally protected areas to develop actions for conservation. This last scheme, the Bolsa Verde, will try to help almost 75,000 families and distribute R$240 million ($140 million) until 2014. Brasil sem miséria has, according to official figures, already benefited more than a million Brazilian children.
 
Hence, the first year of Dilma Rousseff´s government has lived with the best and the worst of Lula. It is true that political corruption is not a new problem in Brazil and that it has been inflated by the proliferation of non-ideological parties needed to constitute a government. It is also true that the conservative media in the country has also recently politicised the issue of corruption by turning it into a sort of crusade; this enthusiasm, on matters that are more for the police and the courts to handle, may end by narrowing the scope of Brazil's political agenda, especially within the opposition.
 
But explanations should not be justifications, and a critical stance towards the conservative media in Brazil does not clean the dirty negotiations in Brasília. In this sense, the problems faced by Dilma Rousseff during her first year as Brazil's president could be turned into a springboard to the reform of January 2012 that aims to renovate the country's governance over the next three years at least. After all, she and the country have many important things to deal with; corruption is but one.

Urgent: help us expose dark money in politics

Cambridge Analytica was the tip of the iceberg. openDemocracy is investigating how dark money is influencing what we see, hear and think across the world. We have many fresh leads to chase down, but need your support to keep going. Please give what you can today – it makes a difference.

Had enough of ‘alternative facts’? openDemocracy is different Join the conversation: get our weekly email

Comments

We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram