December 12 - 18 2011 on openDemocracy

Russia’s unscheduled civil re-awakening dominated openDemocracy front pages this week. Speaking at oDRussia’s timely roundtable (video), prominent journalist Mikhail Fishman declared that Moscow has turned resolutely against the regime.

3 January 2012
Leading the change is the Russian internet: no longer simply entertainment or a largely passive parallel space, the RuNet is now a fully networked tool capable of mobilising the middle class. The glue and nails of the soft authoritarian state - fear and lack of self-respect - have both been seriously undermined by recent events. How will Putin’s regime react? So far the evidence is contradictory: the protest in Moscow was policed meticulously, while in Kazan it was business as usual. State news networks took a temporary break from the usual Putin propaganda, but Putin soon recaptured the airwaves with an eerie charm offensive oscillating between the aggressive and conciliatory.

Elsewhere, as the Middle East struggles with the consequences of its own unfinished revolutions, Paul Ingram urges hope. Anthony Barnett, in an extended revisiting of Raymond Williams' The Long Revolution, asks what political transformation might actually mean in the developed democracies of the west. Leaderless, horizontal government is the perfect revenge to the pure ungoverned market, but how might it work?  Are there any clues to be found in the hip-hop that has come out of the Arab Spring?

Anthony points to ‘the definitive military/political defeat of both Bushism and bin Ladenism’ as one reason for the mobilization of the ‘99%’ in 2011. As Obama’s America leaves Iraq, David Held and Kristian Coates Ulrichsen argue that the wars of Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya are the west’s wars of decline, while Paul Rogers anatomises American arguments for war in Iran, and David Mepham urges alternative forms of pressure on Syria.

In Great Britain, the debate about Cameron’s European veto continued, with Kirsty Hughes urging the Prime Minister to move on from the playground. Barbara Gunnell took aim at the scrooge employers relying on the state to top-up low wages, and the London Olympics Committee comes under fire for their decision to award a building contract to a company in dispute with victims of the Union Carbide disaster.

Today, Monday, is the anniversary of the 2010 Belarusian elections that degenerated into a brutal campaign of repression against opponents of the regime. Spare a few moments for the brave men and women who continue to devote themselves to the fight for freedom.

Four links not to miss:

"Good" financial results of hedge funds entirely due to reporting bias

Paul Krugman on what’s happening in Europe

Mary Kaldor pays tribute to 'Mr Former Havel'

Tony Curzon Price on Hitch22 in memoriam

openDemocracy’s week in 400 words is emailed to Members and Friends to help pay for our great content. Please forward this to any contact you think might be interested and want to join, they should see here or email [email protected].

Stop the secrecy: Publish the NHS COVID data deals

To: Matt Hancock, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care

We’re calling on you to immediately release details of the secret NHS data deals struck with private companies, to deliver the NHS COVID-19 datastore.

We, the public, deserve to know exactly how our personal information has been traded in this ‘unprecedented’ deal with US tech giants like Google, and firms linked to Donald Trump (Palantir) and Vote Leave (Faculty AI).

The COVID-19 datastore will hold private, personal information about every single one of us who relies on the NHS. We don’t want our personal data falling into the wrong hands.

And we don’t want private companies – many with poor reputations for protecting privacy – using it for their own commercial purposes, or to undermine the NHS.

The datastore could be an important tool in tackling the pandemic. But for it to be a success, the public has to be able to trust it.

Today, we urgently call on you to publish all the data-sharing agreements, data-impact assessments, and details of how the private companies stand to profit from their involvement.

The NHS is a precious public institution. Any involvement from private companies should be open to public scrutiny and debate. We need more transparency during this pandemic – not less.

By adding my name to this campaign, I authorise openDemocracy and Foxglove to keep me updated about their important work.

Had enough of ‘alternative facts’? openDemocracy is different Join the conversation: get our weekly email


We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData