My 350 on BREXIT: Earthquake

“For my part, my sentiment is not just embarrassment, but shame. That we should choose the coward’s way of turning on the EU in its moment of need.”

Stein Ringen
5 July 2016

We are coming to realise the enormity of the decision. Deciding to join or not is one thing, leaving is something totally different.

British life – economic, political, social, cultural, scientific, and more – has become arranged around the fact of EU partnership. It all has to be disentangled: an enormous task. Out of it will come a different Britain, diminished.

The decision to hold a referendum unleashed the ugliest imaginable campaign. Nothing in this campaign was FOR anything, it was all AGAINST. There was no leadership, not an idea for deliberation, not a single memorable speech. It was a campaign of fear, fear of the modern world, fear of commitment, fear of those who are different.

Even the remain side did not have a kind word to say about the European project, or about anything else. The referendum was a spur of the moment decision by the prime minister, the people had not asked for it, and as things unfolded we were let down by a dysfunctional political system and an incompetent political leadership.

It is now dawning on us how ugly this was and is. In the aftermath, our political system is not holding up: we have no government, no opposition, no plan. The economy is in disarray. Britain – steady, sensible, tolerant Britain – made itself the one country in the west where the ugly political undercurrent which is now flowing through the democratic world has been allowed to prevail.

For my part, my sentiment is not just embarrassment, but shame. That we should choose to turn our back on modernity. That we should make racism and xenophobia respectable. That we should make ourselves wreckers in Europe. That we should make ourselves quitters. That we should speak of others in Europe in us-and-they terms as if they were enemies. That we should choose the coward’s way of turning on the EU in its moment of need and difficulty and seek out the weak spots where the boot could be put in.

In the aftermath of the historic British vote to leave the EU, openDemocracy is asking for our readers' thoughts on Brexit and what needs to happen next in 350 words. We've had an extraordinary response and you can read them all here.

How can Americans fight dark money and disinformation?

Violence, corruption and cynicism threaten America's flagging democracy. Joe Biden has promised to revive it – but can his new administration stem the flow of online disinformation and shady political financing that has eroded the trust of many US voters?

Hear from leading global experts and commentators on what the new president and Congress must do to stem the flood of dark money and misinformation that is warping politics around the world.

Join us on Thursday 21 January, 5pm UK time/12pm EST.

Hear from:

Emily Bell Leonard Tow Professor of Journalism and director, Tow Center for Digital Journalism, Columbia Journalism School

Anoa Changa Journalist focusing on electoral justice, social movements and culture

Peter Geoghegan openDemocracy investigations editor and author of 'Democracy for Sale: Dark Money and Dirty Politics'

Josh Rudolph Fellow for Malign Finance at the Alliance for Securing Democracy

Chair: Mary Fitzgerald Editor-in-chief, openDemocracy 

Further speakers to be announced

Had enough of ‘alternative facts’? openDemocracy is different Join the conversation: get our weekly email


We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData