Print Friendly and PDF
only search openDemocracy.net

Negativity, not pessimism! Remembering Mark Fisher (1968 – 2017)

"Mark isn't just the figure behind every significant thing I've done as a critic. His theory is now deeply embedded in who I am and what I say."

Repeater Books. All rights reserved.I was so shocked and upset to learn of Mark Fisher's death. For me, Mark was both an idol and, as time passed, someone I was always pleased and not a little humbled to encounter in person and sometimes share a platform with. I didn't know Mark very well personally, and being a generation younger than he was, I only know second-hand the milieu of the 90s and the Cybernetic Culture Research Unit at Warwick University he formed an integral part of, through its growing legacy and some of the reminiscences and thoughts of people who knew him then (Robin MacKaySimon Reynolds and Jeremy Greenspan among them). But as someone a generation younger than Mark, I can express something about the incalculable impact he had on me, my thinking and writing, and my gratitude for the times when he actively, kindly helped me, as well as the times that were just good times.



Mark simply changed my life. By 2009, the year I started blogging, he was a central node in a network of bloggers, thinkers and forums that encompassed critical theory, philosophy and several areas of cultural criticism, especially of popular music. It was a conversation and a community I eagerly wanted to participate in, late and all too hot-headed though I was. As commissioning editor of Zer0 books, he fostered the growth and evolution of this network into a collective of thinkers built on diverse, self-contained and regularly powerful statements that went far. Mark's own essay for the imprint, Capitalist Realism: Is There No Alternative?, was undoubtedly one of the best of the lot. I continue to recommend it widely as one of the most distilled expressions of today's ideological challenges. By the end of 2009, Mark had reached out to me and asked if I wanted to write for Zer0. I was 23. Infinite Music was the result two years later. He told me that I should reconsider the title I had initially proposed – 'The New New Music' (can you believe that!?) – which didn't take Mark's genius, but thank God. His faith in me ­– this despite my frequent and often crude HTML critiques of his positions on music – led to so many amazing opportunities and blessings for the struggling, wet-behind-the-ears critic I was.

I first met Mark in person in April 2010 when we were both part of a panel discussion at London's Café OTO, a 'salon' under the auspices of Wire magazine: "Revenant Forms: The Meaning of Hauntology". He was warm, friendly and funny back-stage, powerful, precise, provocative and funny on-stage. Someone I brought to the event who didn't know Mark and his ideas said to me, “but capitalism is the only system that works!” (this of course is precisely what Capitalist Realism describes and addresses). I next saw him marching alongside thousands of students at one of the protests against the raising of tuition fees and the cutting of the university teaching budget in late 2010, an issue that inflamed and unified the blog network like nothing else, not least Mark himself.

But for me, there was another Mark as well – the formidable writer and theorist, ‘k-punk’. This voice I began to get to know in 2006, the year when he did so much to lay the foundations of ‘hauntology’ (it was his invention, frankly). It was from k-punk that I learned about something called 'neoliberalism' ('what on earth has this guy got against liberalism?' I would wonder). It was from k-punk that I learned that post-modernism was not necessarily the wonderful cultural emancipation I had naively believed it to be. In fact, during these years I was mostly against k-punk. He was critical of more recent trends in electronic music, believing them a poor comparison to what the 90s had offered. This led to a fierce division between writers and bloggers that manifested not just in blogs but magazine sites and a day-long conference at the University of East London, which I attended (the first time I saw Mark in the flesh). Though we both agreed that new music was necessary, naturally his position irritated my young, idealistic self with my special music, and my own blog posts attempted to intervene in support of the new stuff.

This negativity that got me started, this need to talk back to the authority figure, was a testament to the power of his writing. But more so was the way he subsequently taught me as I took a closer look. In preparation for writing on hauntology, I printed out and re-read everything he'd written on or near the subject, underlining and making notes. And he convinced me of his position. He was right. I didn't want to accept his theorising of 'the end of history', thinking it merely pessimistic. His blog posts are so imaginatively, seductively, persuasively written. He's probably the most referenced person on my blog, Rouge's Foam. Then I read Capitalist Realism, and rather than the mere youthful defence of certain musics it could have been, Infinite Music became an attempt to stand with Capitalist Realism and answer k-punk's resounding call for a newfound creative imagination. And it wasn't only theory. Wherever I wrote about music and Mark was writing too (WireElectronic Beats), my writing was improved by the honour and by his raising of the bar (this was the guy who had described Michael Jackson as “only a biotic component going mad in the middle of a vast multimedia megamachine that bore his name.”)

Mark isn't just the figure behind every significant thing I've done as a critic. His theory is now deeply embedded in who I am and what I say. Even the residue of the ideas I have fought against condition my thinking. I have brought his concepts home, they structure my conversations with my friends and family. Capitalist realism: describing the ideology that miserable as it is, there is no alternative to capitalism and that's just the way it is. Business ontology: the ideology that any social or cultural structure must exist as a business. His use of the concept of the Big Other – the imaginary subjectivity that holds important beliefs but may not in fact exist – has guided me through my personal response to Brexit and Trump. (By the way, I couldn't possibly summarise Mark's writing – if you haven't read it already, what are you waiting for?) Even his blackly comic image of a broken neoliberalism, as a cyclist dead and slumped over the handlebars yet continuing downhill and gathering speed, keeps coming back to me.

Mark eventually became something of a role model to me. Asked what sort of space I wanted to carve out between academia and public criticism for my own career, I have often said I wanted to be a Mark Fisher. Yet as he regularly explained with his astonishing balance of passion and precision, the world as it is today, its ideologies and its institutions – it's hardly set up to encourage fringe intellectuals. I'm not sure whether he would have fully encouraged me to aspire to his career, tied so closely as he well knew to challenges of mental health (something I started to live in 2014 when, initially and like so many others, my PhD went nowhere). But he did warmly support and encourage my writing when so many people around me could only regard it with doubt.

One of Mark's most abiding lessons, and for me at least the key to his writing, was something he put pithily to me at the end of an email: “Negativity, not pessimism!” I had not appreciated the subtle but important difference between the two, but then I instantly did. What a rallying call for the nightmarish 2010s. And as others have noted, it was his encouragement and optimism that was especially nourishing. It was certainly not a pessimistic new-music naysayer who wrote the final words of Capitalist Realism:

“The long, dark night of the end of history has to be grasped as an enormous opportunity. The very oppressive pervasiveness of capitalist realism means that even glimmers of alternative political and economic possibilities can have a disproportionately great effect. The tiniest event can tear a hole in the grey curtain of reaction which has marked the horizons of possibility under capitalist realism. From a situation in which nothing can happen, suddenly anything is possible again.”

The last time I saw Mark was after Dhanveer Brar's lecture on the British electronic musician Actress at Goldsmiths college last autumn. He was talking to his friends and colleagues in the distance and still, even after all this time, I was too nervous to say hello. What a fool. I had not stopped to gather up and communicate Mark's importance to me until now, and I hope I don't make such a mistake again. What I've seen over the cybernetic systems this weekend has emphasised how important he was to so many others as well, and well beyond the world of theory too.

Goodbye Mark, and thank you.

About the author

Adam Harper is a musicologist and music critic, and has written for the Wire, the Fader and Resident Advisor. He is a lecturer at City, University of London. Follow his blog, Rouge’s Foam, here.


We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the
oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.