“I’ve never done this before, but I know it works,” said a Uruguayan anti-abortion activist who offered an openDemocracy undercover reporter a controversial ‘treatment’ that claims to be able to ‘reverse’ medical abortions.
Our reporter contacted a 24-hour ‘abortion pill reversal’ hotline run out of the US by the Christian Right group Heartbeat International. The hotline connected her to a local activist in Uruguay.
Within two days, she was connected to a second local activist, and a local doctor, who encouraged her to take this ‘treatment’ – which is not recognised by any Uruguayan medical authorities.
After a six-month openDemocracy investigation, major aid donors and NGOs have said they will investigate anti-LGBT ‘conversion therapy’ at health facilities run by groups they fund.
But unlike the other aid donors, US aid agency PEPFAR has not responded at all.
Please sign this petition to show that it must take action now.
‘Abortion pill reversal’ (APR) prescribes large doses of the hormone progesterone, to be taken after the first of two pills used for a medical abortion. “I can bring it [progesterone] to your place straight away,” said one of the activists.
Progesterone is not dangerous in itself, but health experts have warned against using it like this, describing APR as “unproven” and “dangerous to women’s health”. A previous US medical trial into this method ended abruptly in 2019 after some participants were hospitalised with severe bleeding.
Experts also doubt its efficacy, explaining that most medical abortions do not occur if the second pill is not taken.
However, a handful of conservative US states legally require doctors to inform women that ‘abortion pill reversal’ exists – and a new openDemocracy investigation reveals how it is also spreading globally.
Mexico and Uruguay
Undercover reporters who contacted the Heartbeat International hotline were connected to local doctors and activists willing to provide this ‘treatment’ on four continents – including in Latin America, where abortion rights have long been limited.
Women’s rights campaigners in Uruguay and Mexico told openDemocracy they hadn’t heard of ‘abortion pill reversal’ and it has not been covered by local media. However, our investigation reveals that Heartbeat has connections with doctors in both countries.
In Mexico (where abortion is regulated at state level), our undercover reporter was connected to a doctor who emailed her a handwritten prescription.
“Take it now, as soon as possible,” he advised. The prescription included his medical licence number and address in Mexico City, where abortion is legal within the first 12 weeks of pregnancy. He also said he could get her financial assistance if she had no money to buy the pills.
Uruguay is an exception in the region when it comes to abortion: it is legal up to 12 weeks, longer in cases of rape. Medical abortions, which consist of two pills taken a few days apart, can end pregnancies up to ten weeks.
Our reporter, posing as a young, single and unemployed woman who was ten weeks’ pregnant, contacted Heartbeat’s ‘abortion pill reversal’ network via its online chat.
She was asked to sign a consent form, agreeing that she understood that this ‘treatment’ is an “off-label use of progesterone” and releasing Heartbeat of “any and all claims of whatsoever kind and nature”. It also says she should seek emergency care if she experiences ‘pain, fever or heavy bleeding’.
A local anti-abortion activist then called our reporter and said: “You will do this now: take progesterone. You can get it at the pharmacy, no prescription is needed.”
When asked about the cost of the medication, the activist said: “You don’t have to buy anything.” She connected our reporter to another woman who offered to bring her the progesterone pills for free. “Where do you live? I can bring them to your home straight away,” she said.
A local doctor, who said she was an endocrinologist, also phoned our reporter. She urged her to write down dosage instructions and offered to arrange a free ultrasound for the following day.
APR is “not a standard practice” this doctor admitted, but she claimed that “it’s known from studies that high doses of progesterone can reverse in several cases the activity of mifepristone [the first medical abortion pill].”
The doctor responded to questions about potential health risks, saying “there’s no reason to fear” and “you have to take it as soon as possible – nothing wrong will happen.”
After our reporter said she needed time to make a decision, she was phoned repeatedly by the two local activists and this doctor.
“It’s obvious that your heart is crying out for reversing a process that, if you don’t hurry, will be irreversible. But you’re STILL in time”, wrote one local activist in one of two emails she also sent.
“A very worrying red flag”
Mariana Piastri, a doctor and board member of Uruguay’s Society of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, told openDemocracy that “pushing a woman to terminate or not terminate her pregnancy is a violation of women’s rights, and clearly is not a recommended practice” for healthcare professionals.
Progesterone is widely used in gynaecology, she explained, but “as an attempt to counteract mifepristone, the available studies are of a very poor quality and therefore inconclusive. This is not a use authorised by the FDA (Food and Drugs Administration) or by any other official body.”
Lilian Abracinskas, founder and director of the NGO Mujer y Salud Uruguay (Woman and Health Uruguay), said she had not heard of ‘abortion pill reversal’ and called openDemocracy’s findings a “very worrying red flag”.
The Uruguayan Ministry of Public Health did not reply to our request for comments. Regulatory authorities in Mexico didn’t respond either.
Last year, openDemocracy revealed how ‘crisis pregnancy centres’ affiliated to Heartbeat International were providing vulnerable women with misinformation about their rights and health, including in Latin America.
An openDemocracy undercover reporter also contacted the APR hotline from Ecuador, where operators were unable to connect her to a local doctor, but still emailed her a consent form and dosage instructions.
In Chile, another reporter was connected to a local midwife, who said she had witnessed “just one case of abortion reversal”. She said there is “absolutely no risk” and “no harm in trying it”, despite no conclusive evidence it works.
However, the local doctor that the midwife recommended to write a prescription was not encouraging. He said: “No medication in the world can reverse the effect of [mifepristone]. That’s false.”
Each of our undercover reporters contacted Heartbeat’s 24/7 ‘Abortion pill reversal’ hotline either by telephone or by using the online chat function on the hotline’s website.
In response to questions from openDemocracy, Heartbeat said APR is “a cutting-edge application of a time-tested, FDA-approved treatment used for decades to prevent miscarriage, preterm birth, and support ongoing pregnancy.”
The group suggested Creinin is biased towards abortion access and claimed his study “actually showed that the abortion pill carries major health risks.”
“More than 2,000 women have successfully stopped an abortion and saved their children through the life-saving intervention of APR,” it claimed.
* Additional reporting by Stephania Corpi (Mexico), Paulette Desormeaux (Chile) and Elizabeth Wright (Ecuador)
Get our weekly email