So if refugee migration cannot be solved by border controls, what could stop people dying in the Channel? Here are five ideas to consider:
One: There are no solutions to refugee migration, apart from ending all wars, but there are more sustainable responses. Sustainable responses recognise that the issue is long term and complex, and cannot be solved today by giving the French Police more money or putting a wave machine in the Channel.
Two: The only sustainable responses are multilateral, there are no national solutions.
Three: Multilateral responses have to involve wealthy states accepting that refugees exist and agreeing to play a serious role in hosting them. Currently, wealthy countries’ main contribution is funding for the UNHCR to quarantine people in camps in their regions of origin, and spending billions every year on border fences, patrols, pushbacks, deportations, and detention centres. The UK hosts less than 1% of the world’s refugees. Developing sustainable multilateral responses would be a good way to start playing our part.
Four: Decision makers need to put human dignity at the heart of any answer to the question ‘how can we stop people risking their lives to cross the Channel?’ The answer then becomes focussed on securing people’s access to basic human rights: sanitary accommodation, access to healthcare, free legal advice, freedom from police harassment and brutality, securing access to family reunification, and so on.
Five: We need to recognise that there is no economic case for stopping refugees moving. Borders controls are hugely expensive. The UK Home Office is advertising £385 million worth of contracts for border controls in Calais next year alone. How might this money be spent if human dignity were put at the heart of a plan to develop sustainable responses?
What we have at the moment are two governments creating a crisis that they are then trying to be seen to solve. But they have no tools in their toolbox to solve this problem. Blaming smugglers (and sometimes accidentally confusing them with traffickers), blaming French border patrols, and ploughing more and more money into border controls will not stop refugee movement towards the UK. It will only either increase Channel crossings further or compel refugees to attempt something even more dangerous. And both scenarios will only lead to more people dying. What we need are serious proposals for ending the death spiral and developing responses which are sustainable in the long term.
CommentsWe encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.