Home

Make no mistake, revolutionary struggle in Turkey is up and running!
 A reply to Juan Cole

Turkey will not tolerate, let alone a Saudi-type sharia law, but even a much more 
palatable mildly Islamist neoliberal conservatism, which is, incidentally, a
 direct descendant of the American religious right rather than any Islamic political ideology.


Umut Özge
4 June 2013

Partly due to its astonishing size, and partly due to the withering of the west's
 affection for Turkish PM Erdogan and his authoritative "mildly" Islamist AK party in
 government, the popular uprising that has been shaking Turkey for the last week
 has been receiving unprecedented attention in the international media.  But there are certain misperceptions and misrepresentations 
regarding what is going on in Turkey.

One mainstream perception is that events developed unpredictably, spontaneously 
and without any particular organizing. Was it really unpredictable? It is 
partly true that mass social events are unpredictable; but only partly true.
 Yes, exactly when it will happen is unpredictable, but that it
 will happen is not.  For instance, does one need to be a Marxist to see that 
the EU elites are sitting on a social time bomb? Not really.

In the case of
 Turkey, the revolutionary leftist press has been swarming with analyses pointing to
 the fact that the AKP is increasingly alienating not only social groups like LGBT,
 religious and ethnic minorities, students, artists, Kemalist and liberal
 secularists, and so on,but also people from 
its own electoral base. Look at the Tekel resistance, look at Reyhanli, look at
 public and private sector workers disillusioned with extreme outsourcing, the 
relentlessly assault on worker rights, the widening income gap!

It has also become 
well-established in intellectual circles in Turkey - left and right alike - 
that the AKP project has failed to become hegemonic, which should be evident in
 the increasing dose of mindless violence, the aesthetical, cultural and
 intellectual poverty of its cadres, and the recent withdrawal of the shamefully
 uncritical support of certain Turkish liberals.


Turkish flats

Union activists at DISK headquarters in Istanbul. Demotix/Jodi Hilton. All rights reserved.

Was the uprising spontaneous and without prior organization? Not really.
 The enormous amount of activism that made this uprising so sharp and resilient 
is being documented 24/7, there should be no worries on that score. However, one also must
 not remain silent when Middle East experts like Juan
 Cole draw extremely simplistic conclusions from what they observe of the situation in Turkey. The last thing we need is reductive and hasty analyses
 that - we want to believe, unintentionally - replicate the bankrupt logic of
 Erdogan and his AKP. Cole writes:

“The young people protesting probably don't care that much
 about either the early last call in Taksim's bars or about the fate of Bashar al-Assad… they
 get hassled by the police... My suspicion is that the protesters are leftists or
 the children of parents in the Republican People's party, who do not like 
Erdogan's capitalist leanings nor his embrace of the religious Right as a prime
 constituency.”

Please! Firstly, to call Erdogan and his government's economic
 outlook and policies “capitalist leanings” does not make sense within 
any frame of reference of economics or politics. It is like calling Chavez
 “left leaning”.  Second, the leftist youth in Turkey do know and care about
 their government's foreign policy and its consequences, otherwise they neither
 are, nor can properly be called, “leftists”.  True, there are many protesters who were fairly
 apolitical till the uprising; also there are many people in the crowd who are
 Kemalist secularists usually voting for RPP, and perhaps their parents were from
 RPP.  But the presence of these groups has been absolutely critical in demonstrating that
 Turkey will not tolerate, let alone a Saudi-type sharia law, but even a much more 
palatable mildly Islamist neoliberal conservatism, which is, incidentally, a
 direct descendant of the American religious right rather than any Islamic political ideology.
 However, these groups of protesters are the fuel rather than the engine of this 
uprising. The engine of this uprising has two components: the victims of an 
alienation much more brutal than conservative restrictions in the public sphere
 exercised by the extreme neoliberal authoritarian rule of AKP, and thousands of
 politically engaged people from every area of anti-neoliberal struggle who have
 been bravely defending the rights of these victims for a very long time. It
 should be boldly underlined that the adverb “bravely” has a very different
 significance in the context of Turkey than it has in a typical western
 democracy. All this activism is rooted in a revolutionary stream as old as the
 Republic itself, and has constantly been subjected to unlimited state violence.
 This engine may have become invisible in the clouds of gas and unorganized crowds, but they are the real threat which makes the government reaction so relentlessly brutal, and it is this engine that will pay the price if the crack-down on the uprising succeeds.

Representing the current uprising in Turkey as an apolitical mass of crazy
 middle-class Turks suddenly getting out of control under police harrassment is not
 only appallingly inaccurate, but also an insult to those people on the ground
 who are heroically resisting an extreme dose of police violence at a level
 unseen in a democracy.  There was, and there is organizing on the labour front
 - 2013 has been witness to an explosion in quantity and quality of workers’ 
strikes and organizing, from the cultural front, from Kurdish, minority,
 ecological, feminist, anarchist, LGBT, anti-militarist, anti-displacement
 struggle forces. There has been organizing and preparations on a mass scale before these 
events broke the surface.  Let us not forget, thanks to the AKP, that Turkey's left is very well-
rehearsed against violent crack-downs on peaceful protests, the last big dress 
rehearsal being staged on May Day, 2013. 

Cole adds insult to injury, when he directs his discourse to accord with 
Erdogan's, remarking that the call for the fall of the government is
 undemocratic. If people don't like Erdogan, they should campaign for his
 opponents in the next election. Sorry Mr. Cole, but you cannot sell this
 argument to us. Not just because the people of Turkey are not sufficiently
 indoctrinated in liberal-bourgeois ideology to be lured into such stale and
 cheap tactics of pacification.  But also, and more decisively, because your 
remark is completely decontextualized and therefore meaningless. 

Would you call
 a regime democratic if its army bombs its citizens - namely economically
 desperate Kurdish peasants smuggling diesel on mules over the Iraqi border? Nobody is held responsible for this, and a government official is quoted saying he feels sad for the 
mules carrying the peasants? Can the prime minister of a democratic country
 explicitly call the judiciary in to take action against some individual 
organization? Is it possible in a democratic country to keep thousands
 of students in jail without specific accusations or charges? If law enforcement
 officials in other democratic countries rape child prisoners, do rapists get 
away with it?  In a democratic country, is it OK to jail people because they
 write what they think? Do PMs of democratic countries explicitly complain that 
the principle of checks and balances hinders the government's executive
 abilities? Do the police in democratic countries open fire onto protesters, or 
target tear gas cannons directly into their faces, or gas people in closed
 environments like metro stations, cafes, hospitals, houses? Can the police, Mr.
Cole, kill protesters?

Finally, would you, Mr. Cole, play chess with an opponent who can 
change the movement rules of his pieces at will? The rules of a game have significance only for as long as all the sides abide by them. Democracy is a human 
achievement, but logic is sent from heaven.

Furthermore, given the current degenerate rules of the democracy game in Turkey, taking your 
advice would be suicidal. All the progressive forces would be jailed so that a progressive
 opposition campaig becomes impossible. Either we break this ever-shrinking circle of
 oppression imposed by the neoliberal-authoritative-conservative alliance headed
 by AKP, or we get broken.  To get informed and to connect start here: #occupygezi In solidarity!


Who's getting rich from COVID-19?

Boris Johnson's government stands accused of 'COVID cronyism', after handing out staggering sums of money to controversial private firms to fight COVID-19. Often the terms of these deals are kept secret, with no value-for-money checks or penalties for repeated failures which cost lives. And many major contracts have gone directly to key Tory donors and allies – without competition.

As COVID rates across the country surge, how can we hold our leaders accountable? Meet the lawyers, journalists and politicians leading the charge in our free live discussion on Thursday 1 October at 5pm UK time.

Hear from:

Peter Geoghegan Investigations editor, openDemocracy, and author of 'Democracy for Sale: Dark Money and Dirty Politics'

Jolyon Maugham Barrister and founder of the Good Law Project.

Layla Moran Liberal Democrat MP (TBC)

Chair: Mary Fitzgerald Editor-in-chief of openDemocracy

Had enough of ‘alternative facts’? openDemocracy is different Join the conversation: get our weekly email

Comments

We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData