Home

My 350 on BREXIT: Bremain hardly perfect

Reasons frequently given for opposing the outcome of the British referendum have not all been so reasonable.

Ryan Phillips
15 July 2016

There are numerous good reasons to be disappointed by the outcome of the British vote on European Union membership. To be stripped of political rights, work and opportunities for friendship and love are very serious harms indeed. In the meantime, racist and xenophobic incidents in Britain are on the rise and Europe’s 50-plus year experiment in institutionalized cooperation has taken a major hit.  

But the reasons frequently given for opposing the outcome of the British referendum have not all been so reasonable. Here are 3:

1) “The sheeple voted against their interests.”

This statement relies upon the assumption that we possess knowledge of people's objective interests. The point is not that this is an elitist, anti-democratic view (which it is), but that it is a view held without good reason. Also, don't imagine that those who voted to remain in the EU did so because they were more informed, reflective, intelligent and far-sighted.

2) “War, war, war, EU, no war.”

Invoking the threat of war as an obvious reason why people should have voted to remain in the EU isn't very convincing and, in my view, shouldn't be. The threat is slight.

3) “This was the result of anti-immigrant, xenophobic, racist nationalism.”

There is evidence that this played a significant part. But there are also strong social democratic reasons for being wary about the EU’s commitment to “ever closer Union.” Not only is the EU’s market-making bias quite obvious, but there is good evidence that people are less willing to support redistributive measures when the beneficiaries are people from out-groups. If one is concerned about how policies benefit or burden the least advantaged in society, this fact of contemporary political psychology should be taken seriously. The decision by the German government and other creditor countries to impose misery on debtor countries like Greece in the wake of the sovereign debt crisis speaks to the way solidarity is only weakly multi-national.

My hope is that these 3 arguments will diminish in importance as people continue to envision what will make for a fairer and freer Britain … and Europe. 

In the aftermath of the historic British vote to leave the EU, openDemocracy is asking for our readers' thoughts on Brexit and what needs to happen next in 350 words. We've had an extraordinary response and you can read them all here.

 

Sign the petition: save our Freedom of Information

The UK government is running a secretive unit inside Michael Gove’s Cabinet Office that’s accused of ‘blacklisting’ journalists and hiding ‘sensitive’ information from the public. Experts say they’re breaking the law – and it’s an assault on our right to know what our government is doing.

We’re not going to let it stand. We’re launching a legal battle – but we also need a huge public outcry, showing that thousands back our call for transparency. Will you add your name?

Had enough of ‘alternative facts’? openDemocracy is different Join the conversation: get our weekly email

Comments

We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData