Home

Reopening of the NATO supply routes won't stop cross-national terrorism from Pakistan

The Pakistani military and intelligence service will not easily break the ties with Islamist terrorist groups in Afghanistan like the Haqqani network. Islamabad wants to keep a foothold in Afghanistan when western troops leave and use Islamic extremism as a counterforce to ethnic conflict and incompatibility strewn across the border. 

Ehsan Azari Stanizai
12 July 2012

A seven-month deadlock between the US and Pakistan ended last week when the hard word “sorry” over the November killing of 24 Pakistani troops in an errant American air strike was uttered and $1.2 billion in cash was coughed up in exchange for the re-opening of the NATO supplies routes into Afghanistan. For the US, it is certainly beneficial in terms of logistics and saving, but it would be naïve if we think the deal would be an open sesame to close safe terrorist sanctuaries in Pakistan.  

Western and Pakistan interests in Afghanistan are not on the same page. The Pakistani army which is the real power base in Pakistan has one obsession, and that is to have a weak and chaotic Afghanistan once the NATO troops leave the war-torn country at the end of 2014. The only weapon that Pakistan has in order to ensure its control of Afghanistan is a covert support for the violent religious extremist group known as the Haqqani network among the Afghan and Pakistani Taliban. Much of the violence in Afghanistan has been plotted and carried out by the Pakistan-based Haqqani network.  

It is an undeniable fact that the al-Qaida-linked armed networks of Haqqani insurgents are headquartered in Pakistan where it runs several training camps as well as squads of suicide bombers. The network regularly targets Afghan and coalition forces within the Afghan capital and the surrounding areas. The Pakistani military and its infamous Inter-Service Intelligence (ISI) continue to provide clandestine support to the network.

For many years, the US has tried a carrot and stick approach vis-à-vis Pakistan in order to dissociate the ISI from the Haqqani network, but to no avail.  All its unrelenting requests and pleas to close the Haqqani headquarters and camps in Pakistan have fallen on deaf ears.

The truth is that Pakistan will never go after the Haqqani safe havens. The US lacklustre reaction to Osama bin Laden’s capture and killing in May 2011 reassured Pakistan further that it  can get away easily with anything. No one ever has seriously asked Pakistan so far, as to how the world’s most wanted terrorist responsible for mass murders and devastation, was found hiding in a mansion in a Pakistani garrison town with his wives and eighteen family members and also with satellite dishes and computers.

“Despite many billions of dollars, international assistance to Pakistan, particularly from the US, its largest donor, is neither improving the government’s performance against jihad groups nor stabilizing its nascent democracy,” wrote the Brussels-based International Crisis Group in its latest report on 27 June.

So, what lies behind Pakistan's  proverbial intransigence? Islamabad’s inherent existential fear over the survival of the country is the rationale behind Pakistan’s symbiotic link with the Haqqani network. Both the military and civilian governing elites in Pakistan define alliance with the Haqqani network as part of this country’s multiple national interests. Pakistan regards Haqqani as a strategic asset which could be used as a proxy in Kabul once the west leaves Afghanistan. The network would also be used to fight those Pakistani Taliban and Beluchi separatists who are currently locked in battle with Pakistan’s army.

Separation of the Pashtuns (about 50-million people straddled on both sides of the Afghan Pakistan border) from Islamic extremism is the real Pakistani reckoning day, for it would stir a separatist movement among the Pakistani Pushtuns like the separatist movement in Baluchistan. For that reason, Islamic extremism is maintained for uniting the Pashtuns, Baluchis, Sindis and Punjabis of the jigsaw puzzle nations. This is just the way former Yugoslavia used communism in order to glue together Kosovo, Slovenia, Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina. 

There has been bad blood between Afghanistan and Pakistan for years. In the eyes of Afghans, Pakistan has been a state with illegitimate borders and its very formation in 1947 merely a colonial project. Afghanistan was the only country to refuse to recognise Pakistan in the United Nations. 

The imaginary border that divides the two countries was drawn by the Foreign Secretary of British India, Sir Mortimer Durand in 1893. The border was never intended to be a frontier between two states; it was rather a military line of control establishing how far the British East India Company needed to push a buffer zone west of the Indus River.

To tackle all these internal problems and to draw the most incompatible ethnic groups together, the power equilibrium in Pakistan has veered from secular military rule to a military rule using armed Islamic extremist groups since the early 1970s. 

Losing Haqqani in Pakistani thinking is thus tantamount to losing influence in Afghanistan, even worse, losing its own Pashtun tribal belt. This is the reason why Pakistan keeps a virulent jihadi ideology among the Pashtuns inside Pakistan and Afghanistan in order to deny them their nationalism.  

Pakistan’s use of religious extremism as a policy tool is the Gordian knot that the west needs to cut if it really wants to succeed in Afghanistan before it is too late. The past roller coaster experience with Pakistan's reluctance to go against the extremists groups on its soil is a warning sign of this verity.

Will COVID break up the UK?

Support for Scottish independence is at record levels. Support for a united Ireland is at record levels. Support for Welsh independence is at record levels.

The British state's management of the COVID crisis has widely been seen as disastrous. Will the pandemic accelerate the break-up of the United Kingdom?

Join us on Thursday 6 August at 5pm UK time/6pm CET for a live discussion.

Hear from:

Anthony Barnett Founder of openDemocracy, he has often written about the need for a progressive England to emerge from the shadow of Britain.

Allison Morris Security correspondent and columnist with the Irish News, and an analyst of politics in Northern Ireland.

Harriet Protheroe-Soltani Trade union organiser for Wales and the south-west, vice chair of the campaign group Momentum, and has written about rising support for Welsh independence on the Left.

Chair: Adam Ramsay Editor at openDemocracy and frequent writer about Scottish independence, most recently in The Guardian.

Had enough of ‘alternative facts’? openDemocracy is different Join the conversation: get our weekly email

Comments

We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData