Home

Azerbaijani demolitions: an update

The authorities’ destruction of a building and precious archive of human-rights workers in Baku is an act of mindless cruelty that damages Azerbaijan itself, says Thomas de Waal.
Thomas de Waal
24 August 2011

A month ago I published an article on openDemocracy entitled “Azerbaijan: speed without system” (29 July 2011). In it I wrote about the threats to the office of Azerbaijan’s foremost human-rights activists Leyla and Arif Yunus, in a building which also housed Baku’s only women’s crisis centre and a demining charity.

Two weeks later, on the evening of 11 August, the Azerbaijani authorities struck. Two officials, one from the municipal government and one from the state property ministry, showed up at the Institute of Peace and Democracy (IPD) and said they had orders to start demolition of the house next door. They asked IPD employee Azad Isazade, who was inside the building, to leave. He stepped outside but did not leave the street. The human-rights activists had made contingency plans to summon help if the office was under threat and soon journalists and a Norwegian diplomat were on the scene observing what happened.

Several young men started attacking the front wall of the office - still decorated with inscriptions saying it was the private property of Leyla Yunus - with crowbars and ripping out the windows. Then a bulldozer pulled up and began smashing it. Radio Liberty’s Azeri service filmed what happened. The building was reduced to a pile of rubble.
 
The office tenants were taken by surprise. Leyla Yunus herself was in Norway. The tenants had relaxed a little after the Baku administrative economic court ruled in May that the destruction of the building was inadmissible without a court decision. They expected that the clash over the office would last at least until the end of 2011.

As a result they had removed a few of their possessions from the office but left most of them inside. So they lost to the bulldozer not only a building in central Baku that belongs to them but computers, furniture and, most importantly, personal archives. They lost Arif Yunus’s book collection and his own archive of the national movement in Azerbaijan from 1987-94 (newspapers, samizdat literature and brochures). They also lost portraits of Leyla’s grandparents painted by famous Azerbaijani artists. 

Why did the authorities strike in this way? One feature of this awful story leaps out, which is that they were not just unafraid of the international attention their actions were getting - but that such attention actually seemed to spur them on to act worse.

The office was demolished only a day after an article appeared in the New York Times on the eviction of Baku residents from their homes which quoted Leyla Yunus (see Amanda Erickson, “Middle-Class Families Face Evictions in Azerbaijan”, 10 August 2011).

The United States embassy, the European Union, Amnesty International and many other international organisations condemned the demolition. But, as in the case of the two jailed bloggers Emin Milli and Adnan Hajizade, international pressure seems to have had no effect or even produced a contrary reaction. Milli and Hajizade, who were jailed on clearly fabricated charges, were released in November 2010. The authorities waited several months after a personal appeal by President Obama to set them free.

Azerbaijani official decision-making is a black box. Nowadays, the country combines increased confidence and sophistication with the kind of mindless cruelty visited on the Institute of Peace and Democracy. Those who took the decision to demolish the office must know that this kind of action hurts Azerbaijan’s efforts to build a reputation as a grown-up international actor. But they went ahead and did it anyway.

Can there be a green populist project on the Left?

Many on the Left want to return to a politics based on class, not populism. They point to Left populist parties not reaching their goals. But Chantal Mouffe argues that as the COVID-19 pandemic has put the need for protection from harm at the top of the agenda, a Left populist strategy is now more relevant than ever.

Is this an opportunity for a realignment around a green democratic transformation?

Join us for a free live discussion on Thursday 22 October, 5pm UK time/12pm EDT.

Hear from:

Paolo Gerbaudo Sociologist and political theorist, director of the Centre for Digital Culture at King’s College London and author of ‘The Mask and the Flag: Populism and Global Protest’ and ‘The Digital Party: Political Organisation and Online Democracy’, and of the forthcoming ‘The Great Recoil: Politics After Populism and Pandemic’.

Chantal Mouffe Emeritus Professor of Political Theory at the University of Westminster in London. Her most recent books are ‘Agonistics. Thinking the World Politically’, ‘Podemos. In the Name of the People’ and ‘For a Left Populism’.

Spyros A. Sofos Researcher and research coordinator at the Center for Middle Eastern Studies, Lund University and author of ‘Nation and Identity in Contemporary Europe’, ‘Tormented by History’ and ‘Islam in Europe: Public Spaces and Civic Networks'.

Chair: Walid el Houri Researcher, journalist and filmmaker based between Berlin and Beirut. He is partnerships editor at openDemocracy and lead editor of its North Africa, West Asia project.

Had enough of ‘alternative facts’? openDemocracy is different Join the conversation: get our weekly email

Comments

We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData