Skip to content

How all-powerful institutions keep Europe in gridlock

The European Union’s ruling bodies have always shamelessly grabbed power to themselves and away from the people – but this has left the bloc stuckThis article is a summary of the second of three lengthy essays about the European Union by the historian Perry Anderson, published in the London Review

How all-powerful institutions keep Europe in gridlock
Fortresses of rules: the European Court of Justice and European Parliament | frantic/Alamy Stock Photo. All rights reserved
Published:

Perry Anderson’s essay ‘Ever Closer Union?’ explores the significance of the different institutions within the European Union. Their common principle, he finds, is that they minimise democracy, with the leaders of the most powerful states directing the affairs of the union from within an impregnable fortress of rules.

Anderson starts with the European Court of Justice, established in 1952 as part of the European Coal and Steel Community, which evolved into the European Economic Community and eventually the EU.

Anderson notes that the first president of the court was an Italian fascist, the first German judge a “devoted” Nazi, one of the first advocate-generals another German who was heavily involved in running occupied France during the war, and the other advocate-general a Vichy functionary, “in charge of co-ordinating the first wave of persecution of French Jews”. Not all appointments to the court were fascists, but they “were nearly all political” – few had any legal qualifications.