Home

Jordan getting chastised: another take on the protests

munir.jpg

Jordan's allies have turned up the heat. The kettle is whistling, but has not boiled over.


Munir Atalla
26 November 2012

Last Friday, Prime Minister Abdullah Ensour announced a suspension of  the subsidy on all fuel products including gas, kerosene and petrol.  Although stoves were cold, the streets were on fire with the largest protester turn-outs since the summer of the Arab Awakening.  Within days, people were speculating whether or not the Jordanian regime was reaching its expiry date. 

This was premature for a number of reasons.  Many pointed to the entrenchment of the Jordanian regime, the majority of people who prefer the King to an Islamist alternative.  Others pointed to the fact that the government proposed a cash compensation of up to JD600 a year for low-income families to make up for the lack of subsidy.  Still others discounted the protests as nothing more than a bout of opportunism by the Islamic Action Front - piggybacking on public anger to regain lost territory in the realm of public opinion.  Protests died down in no small part due to the supreme management of the Police Forces and the authoritative prowess of the Police Chief.  All of these reasons are legitimate and explain a large part of what is taking place in Jordan, but not quite all of it.

Jordan's debt is in the billions.  Its economy rests, "almost entirely on external aid to finance expenditures" according to economy analyst Saleem Haddad.  Those who control the intravenous drip of this aid play a big part in determining how anaesthetized the population is - namely, the United States and Gulf donors.  For months now, the Gulf along with the west have cut Jordan off, plunging the country into painful withdrawal.  The reason is unclear, but not financial.  A billion dollars in aid is not a particularly taxing sum for Gulf powerhouses.  What they seem to be doing is holding Jordan out over the ledge, showing the government the steep long fall, twisting his arm until he says "uncle". 

From this point on in the story, one can only speculate.  There is no way to know what negotiations have taken place behind closed doors.  Al-Quds newspaper suggests that this power play is Syria-related - that the unspoken allies of the Free Syrian Army want Jordan to deploy a military presence into Syria under the guise of humanitarian aid, but that the Jordanians have refused.  Others postulate that the issue has more to do with a so-called "Final Solution" to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.  The bombardment of Gaza has a lot to do with it.  With Hamas gaining legitimacy via Egypt, the Palestinian Authority is looking increasingly outdated.  Could the west be looking for someone to who could hold onto the West Bank in its stead?  Jordan's donors are flexing their muscles, and what could Jordan be scared into doing?

Time will tell who is manipulating whom.  Regardless, there are several courses of action possible for Jordan.  The most desirable would be for Jordan to start a steady transfer of power to an elected Prime Minister.  It must be made clear to the west that the government is accountable not only to the IMF and his donors, but also to their people.  Whoever he is, he must make sure that the people's disgruntlement is utilized constructively to build a nation.  Last week, protesters in Jordan were shouting facetious slogans that were unthinkable only years ago.  Jordan's allies have turned up the heat. The kettle is whistling, but has not boiled over.

Stop the secrecy: Publish the NHS COVID data deals


To: Matt Hancock, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care

We’re calling on you to immediately release details of the secret NHS data deals struck with private companies, to deliver the NHS COVID-19 datastore.

We, the public, deserve to know exactly how our personal information has been traded in this ‘unprecedented’ deal with US tech giants like Google, and firms linked to Donald Trump (Palantir) and Vote Leave (Faculty AI).

The COVID-19 datastore will hold private, personal information about every single one of us who relies on the NHS. We don’t want our personal data falling into the wrong hands.

And we don’t want private companies – many with poor reputations for protecting privacy – using it for their own commercial purposes, or to undermine the NHS.

The datastore could be an important tool in tackling the pandemic. But for it to be a success, the public has to be able to trust it.

Today, we urgently call on you to publish all the data-sharing agreements, data-impact assessments, and details of how the private companies stand to profit from their involvement.

The NHS is a precious public institution. Any involvement from private companies should be open to public scrutiny and debate. We need more transparency during this pandemic – not less.


By adding my name to this campaign, I authorise openDemocracy and Foxglove to keep me updated about their important work.

Had enough of ‘alternative facts’? openDemocracy is different Join the conversation: get our weekly email

Related articles

Comments

We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData