Dark Money Investigations: News

Philip Hammond rebuked over bank lobbying allegations

The former chancellor considered a legal injunction to block the verdict of Westminster’s lobbying watchdog

Martin Williams
1 September 2021, 12.41pm
Philip Hammond tried to block the watchdog from publishing its ruling
Ian Davidson/Alamy Live News

The former UK chancellor, Philip Hammond, has been reprimanded by Westminster’s lobbying watchdog after he wrote to a Treasury official on behalf of a bank he was paid to advise.

In July 2020, Hammond emailed with a pitch from OakNorth Bank for a new “financial toolkit” that the government could use in response to the pandemic.

In the correspondence, obtained by The Daily Telegraph, the Conservative lord asked for the Treasury’s second most senior official to “pass it to anyone else who might be appropriate”.

Westminster’s lobbying watchdog, the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments (ACOBA), condemned Hammond’s conduct as “not acceptable” saying it was “an unwise step to contact senior officials at the Treasury on OakNorth’s behalf”.

Get dark money out of UK politics!

Sign our petition to put pressure on the government to tighten electoral laws and shine more light on political donations. We need to know who is giving what to our political parties.

The watchdog’s chair, Eric Pickles, said there was “a reasonable concern” that Hammond’s engagement with the Treasury “was only made available to OakNorth as a direct result of your time as chancellor”.

Letters reveal that Hammond tried to block the watchdog from publishing its ruling, and even considered a legal injunction. He demanded that the verdict be withdrawn and redrafted, telling Pickles: “What is appropriate or inappropriate is ultimately a matter of individual judgement… You cannot move the goalposts.”

But Pickles responded saying the decision had been final, and that Hammond’s behaviour had not been “in keeping with the purpose of the rules”.

Hammond tried to block the watchdog from publishing its ruling, even considering an injunction

The former chancellor left government in 2019 and signed up to OakNorth’s advisory board in early 2020.

When he was appointed to the OakNorth role, ACOBA ordered him to avoid contacting government ministers or officials for at least two years after the date on which he left office.

He was accused of breaching the Ministerial Code by breaking this ban last month, but defended his behaviour, saying: “My communication was neither seeking to influence policy, nor motivated by an attempt to secure business (or any other form of benefit) on behalf of Oaknorth or its partners/clients.”

Records show that Hammond quit his role at OakNorth in June, before allegations of lobbying first emerged.

At the time, Labour’s deputy leader, Angela Rayner, said: “Philip Hammond has broken the Ministerial Code, which is very clear about the conduct of former ministers. The breach needs to be investigated by the Cabinet secretary.

Related story

Exclusive: UK government accused of transparency failings amid growing concerns over ties between business and Westminster after David Cameron lobbying scandal

“Hammond has entirely disregarded the conditions that were made clear to him when he took the job with OakNorth Bank. If the rules are treated with such derision by the former Chancellor then the whole system is rotten.”

ACOBA’s ruling against Hammond is unlikely to have any real effect, as the watchdog has itself been criticised for being “toothless”. In April, openDemocracy revealed it had met only once since Boris Johnson’s election win in 2019.

Pickles has also faced heavy scrutiny in his role as the watchdog’s chair, and is one of 40 lords recently reported to Parliament’s standards commissioner over allegations raised by openDemocracy about their declaration of financial interests.

He was also accused of a conflict of interest after failing to publicly declare his role in a Conservative business lobbying forum, which boasts of its access to government ministers.

Russia's elections: a test for the future?

As Russia votes in a new parliament, observers seem divided between hope and pessimism.
Do these elections hold some positive lessons for the future, or are they the "last elections" that Russia is going to hold in the next decade?
Our expert panellists will offer their thoughts and answer your questions. Join us for this free live event at 5pm UK time, 23 September.

Had enough of ‘alternative facts’? openDemocracy is different Join the conversation: get our weekly email


We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData