openDemocracyUK: Opinion

On holiday in sunny, sensible Portugal, I realised England is bad, actually

The Portuguese use masks to keep COVID at bay, while the English rely on nostalgia and a misguided sense of national exceptionalism

caroline m.jpg
Caroline Molloy
21 October 2021, 4.05pm
People wear face masks to visit the Nossa Senhora de Graça viewpoint in Lisbon, Portugal
Jorge Castellanos / SOPA Images/Sipa USA

For a certain type of Englishman or woman, our national self-identity is one of stoicism, moderation, and being ‘good in a crisis’. You know the script – we withstood the blitz and beat the Nazis, possibly with a flashback to the band playing on as the Titanic sank.

The ‘good in a crisis’ version of our identity needs a history update and a geography lesson, if we’re to understand why Britain is seeing COVID rates soar once more whilst our western European neighbours look on in dismay.

I arrived back from a holiday in Portugal this week reflecting on our national character, and that of another small maritime nation, one with the longest-standing national borders in Europe. One that, like England, for a time controlled the most expansive empire in the world, but now merely shares the language of an economically mighty former colony across the Atlantic.

Portugal has one of the highest vaccination rates in the world, far higher than Britain’s. But unlike Britain, it’s not putting all its faith in jabs and a sense of national exceptionalism. Everyone – including children – wears masks inside public buildings, shops, and on (excellent) public transport. Publicly owned buildings, sights and shops also had staff politely reminding tourists about mask-wearing (the Portuguese simply get on with it), and sometimes taking our temperature, with signs reminding us not to spend too much time inside. Life is lived more outside, of course – but many wear masks on the street, too, certainly in crowded outdoor areas.

Help us uncover the truth about Covid-19

The Covid-19 public inquiry is a historic chance to find out what really happened.

I didn’t notice anyone looking discernibly oppressed by any of this, but it’s good to check. In England, sections of the media have suggested that mandating masks is a totalitarian, even fascist, measure. I put this to a couple of residents. They looked baffled. This is a country that knows exactly what fascism is – it overthrew it in 1974, when the Carnation Revolution ended Salazar’s brutal regime.

But unlike England, Portugal appears to have come to terms with its relative insignificance, loss of imperial status, and turbulent history, and has focused on looking after its residents.

Unlike England, Portugal appears to have come to terms with its loss of imperial status

In the heart of Lisbon, locals chatted to each other across scenic alleyways, tolerating our tourist presence; controls on rents and evictions, whilst reduced in recent years, still to some extent protecting long-standing residents from being gentrified out. The shops were full of fresh produce – unlike the shelves I returned to in my local supermarket back home. Environmental measures and solar panels were everywhere. The hash dealers were cheery and open (we declined), drugs having been decriminalised here 20 years ago and addiction falling as a result. After Lisbon we stayed in a non-touristy, working-class town, but nowhere we went felt ‘edgy’. We spotted signs everywhere making clear that refugees were welcome. Portugal, long one of the poorest countries in western Europe, felt the heat of the 2008 financial crisis, but elected a socialist minority government supported by the Left and Greens that undid some of the neoliberal reforms imposed in its wake and invested in services instead.

I returned to England to find a government that is treating mandatory mask-wearing as some kind of nuclear ‘Plan B’ option to be withheld until the last possible minute, even as COVID cases and hospital admissions soar. To see the freedom not to wear a mask, to infect others, still being treated as a patriotic liberty to be preserved at all costs, in the eyes of the right-wing media and Tory MPs.

I returned to find our area had become one of the country’s COVID hotspots, after the privatised lab thought to have served our drive-through test centres allegedly missed 43,000 positive diagnoses. I found some friends sick with COVID, and others being threatened by privatised Test and Trace operatives if they went outside for a breath of fresh air, even when the call had come long after they’d actually had the virus.

Some friends were being hassled to hand over all their contacts – knowing that those who would be made to isolate had no guarantee of job protection or sick pay – and certainly not of adequate sick pay – nor of getting the hard-to-access and inadequate COVID support cash, in Britain’s threadbare welfare state, with benefits amongst the lowest in Europe. Knowing that their contacts were already struggling to pay the energy bills, feed the kids, and afford decent internet; knowing that those who fall behind with rent have had their protection from eviction stripped away – and that property prices in our small town are surging as Londoners weary of pandemic life ‘dash for space’.

It’s little surprise that when it comes to real crises, our neoliberal state has failed us utterly.

In Britain, many are left having to rely not on the state but on crusading footballers and the goodwill of privatised utility companies. Public health interventions are written off as fascist – and if someone, a leader of the opposition, say, was to come along offering free broadband, European-style rent controls and better sick pay, well, that’s Venezuelan-style totalitarianism, we’re told.

This neoliberal doctrine has warped the psyche of our ruling class – of all of us – harming trust, weakening resilience, and leaving us intensely vulnerable to this pandemic. Its solutions have been trained for decades on a string of fake crises stoked by tabloids – that we are ‘swamped’ by migrants, ‘duped’ by ‘benefit scroungers’ and ‘shirkers’ claiming disability, that our ‘way of life’ is threatened by drugs, street crime and indeed the hapless ageing population.

All of these are seen as issues that can be ‘solved’ with a profitable morass of call centres, websites, and deliberately inhospitable ‘centres’, provided by outsourcing firms paid billions, overseen by consultants paid millions, staffed by demoralised workers paid peanuts; a corporate world that treats humans as objects to be corralled, disciplined, left on hold, and abused – the latest ruse is to make benefit claimants pose for ‘kidnapper-style’ pictures. To treat them as units to be bounced around between the pillars of the market, their patience and human needs for support, treated merely as economists’ ‘externalities’ to be offloaded onto users in the name of someone else’s bottom line.

These ‘solutions’ may work to solve ‘problems’ that were always nothing more than invented moral panics. But they offer little insight as to what to do when things really go wrong.

It’s little surprise that when it comes to real crises – be it COVID, or indeed climate change – this neoliberal state has failed us utterly.

You might, if you were the certain type of Englishman or woman invoked at the start of the piece, perhaps retort, if you like Portugal so much, why don’t you just move there?

Well, I have an Irish passport, so I could. But that doesn’t really solve your problem.

Why should you care about freedom of information?

From coronation budgets to secretive government units, journalists have used the Freedom of Information Act to expose corruption and incompetence in high places. Tony Blair regrets ever giving us this right. Today's UK government is giving fewer and fewer transparency responses, and doing it more slowly. But would better transparency give us better government? And how can we get it?

Join our experts for a free live discussion at 5pm UK time on 15 June.

Hear from:

Claire Miller Data journalism and FOI expert
Martin Rosenbaum Author of ‘Freedom of Information: A Practical Guidebook’; former BBC political journalist
Jenna Corderoy Investigative reporter at openDemocracy and visiting lecturer at City University, London
Chair: Ramzy Alwakeel Head of news at openDemocracy

We’ve got a newsletter for everyone

Whatever you’re interested in, there’s a free openDemocracy newsletter for you.

Who is bankrolling Britain's democracy? Which groups shape the stories we see in the press; which voices are silenced, and why? Sign up here to find out.


We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData